Social Science Research Council committee records

id
5719
origination
Social Science Research Council (U.S.). Committee on a Study of Sources of Information on the Operation of the Eighteenth Amendment
date statement
1926
key date
1926
identifier (local_mss)
2807
org unit
Manuscripts and Archives Division
call number
MssCol 2807
b-number
b12416089
total components
49
total series
4
max depth
2
boost queries
(none)
component layout
Default Layout
Extended MARC Fields
false
Extended Navigation
false
created
2013-04-01 15:05:24 UTC
updated
2017-05-24 15:02:04 UTC
status note
(missing)
Display Aeon link
true

Description data TOP

unitid
{"value"=>"2807", "type"=>"local_mss"}
{"value"=>"MssCol 2807", "type"=>"local_call"}
unitdate
{"type"=>"inclusive", "normal"=>"1926", "value"=>"1926"}
date_inclusive_start
1926
date_inclusive_end
1926
keydate
1926
date_start
1926
date_end
1926
unittitle
{"value"=>"Social Science Research Council committee records"}
physdesc
{"format"=>"structured", "physdesc_components"=>[{"name"=>"extent", "value"=>"3.5 linear feet (6 boxes)"}], "supress_display"=>true}
repository
{"value"=>"<span class=\"corpname\">The New York Public Library. Manuscripts and Archives Division.</span> <div class=\"address\"> <span class=\"addressline\">Stephen A. Schwarzman Building</span> <span class=\"addressline\">Fifth Avenue at 42nd Street, New York, NY 10018-2788</span></div>"}
abstract
{"value"=>"The Social Science Research Council authorized the formation of an advisory committee to conduct a national survey of the records available in public and private agencies and institutions that would be of value to a study of the social consequences of the Eighteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1920, which prohibited the manufacture, transportation and sale of intoxicating beverages. The purpose of the committee was to organize and conduct a survey of primary sources and suggest future research. By 1926 the committee had completed its study and issued a report to the Council. Collection consists of correspondence, director's records and field surveys. Correspondence of the director of research, George E.G. Catlin, and his executive assistant, Vera Mikol, with college and university professors in the social sciences, with regional directors and others, relates to the administration of the committee. Also, reports, memoranda, financial papers, and survey reports prepared by field workers who made on-site visits to public and private institutions in major cities and conducted interviews with local officials."}
langmaterial
{"value"=>"Materials in English"}
prefercite
{"value"=>"<p>Social Science Research Council committee records, Manuscripts and Archives Division, The New York Public Library</p>"}
origination
{"value"=>"Social Science Research Council (U.S.). Committee on a Study of Sources of Information on the Operation of the Eighteenth Amendment", "type"=>"corpname"}
bioghist
{"value"=>"<p>The Social Science Research Council was founded in 1923 by a consortium of national associations in the field of the social sciences (including the American Economic Association, the American Sociological Society, and the American Political Science Association) with the objective of promoting scientific research into social problems especially those involving multi-disciplinary approaches and solutions. In October of 1925 the Council authorized the formation of a committee for the conducting of a national survey of the kinds of records available in public and private agencies and institutions that would be of value to a study of the social consequences of the Eighteenth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution which was adopted in 1920 and which prohibited the manufacture, transportation, and sale of intoxicating beverages. The working title of the committee was: Committee on a Study of Sources of Information on the Operation of the Eighteenth Amendment. Initially, the word \"Preliminary\" preceded the word \"Study\" in the title, but it was later deleted. Prof. George E. Q. Catlin of Cornell was appointed its Director of Research, and Prof. John L. Gillin of Wisconsin, its Chairman. Other members included: Haven Emerson, Irving Fisher, Edgar Sydenstricker, John A. Fairlie, and Walter Thompson.</p> <p>The purpose of the Committee was to organize and conduct a survey of primary sources of a kind that would shed light upon the social, economic, public health, and criminal effects of prohibition and to suggest lines of future research. Secondary sources were not to be included. Strict objectivity was to be maintained in evaluating sources, and no conclusions were to be drawn with respect to the social advantages (or disadvantages) of prohibition. Given the controversial nature of the subject matter the Committee sought to avoid all publicity so that its work could be carried on with a minimum of outside criticism and interference.</p> <p>The work of investigation began in April of 1926. An office was established in New York City from which form letters were sent to heads of department of sociology and political science requesting aid in identifying local sources of information. Regional Directors were appointed for the eight areas into which the country was divided (with a central investigator to cover national sources), and schedules were defined outlining the kinds of agencies to be surveyed in each field for the guidance of the field workers who were recruited from colleges and universities. The work of the Committee was carried on largely by correspondence supplemented by occasional meetings of Regional Directors with the Director of Research.</p> <p>By August of 1926 the Committee had completed its work and had issued its report to the Council. The final report of the Council was published in April of 1928 in mimeograph form: Sources of Information concerning the Operation of the Eighteenth Amendment / A Report of a Special Advisory Committee of the Social Science Research Council (70 p.). This report is available in the Library's General Research & Humanities Division (classmark: *C. p. v.) 1949</p>"}
scopecontent
{"value"=>"<p>The papers of the Committee which are contained in 6 Hollinger boxes and which fall in the period mainly April - August of 1926 are divided into three main series: Correspondence of the Director, Papers of the Director, and Field Surveys. At the end of the collection is a single folder of Miscellaneous Printed Matter. The Correspondence which is arranged alphabetically is that of Prof. George E. G. Catlin, Director of Research of the Committee and that of his executive assistant Vera Mikol. The correspondence is mainly with college and university professors in the field of the social sciences, foundation and government officials, and relates to the hiring of field workers, regional directors, developing schedules used in the survey, determing the location of records to be surveyed, and other administrative matters. Records of disbursements for salaries and expenses may be found in the John L. Gillin file and in the Edmund E. Day file, the latter having served as treasurer of the Committee. The correspondence of other Regional Directors in addition to that of Prof Gillin who served as Regional Director of Area VI (Ohio, Mich., Wis., Ia., Minn., undated, S. D.) include: William E. Mosher (Area I, N. Y. Penna., N. J., Dela.), Hugh Carter (Area III, Md., Va., N. C., S. C., Ga., Fla.), A. F. Kuhlman (Area IV, III., Ind., Mo.), Walter C. Reckless (Area V, Ky, W. V., Tenn., Miss., Ala., Ark., La.), Nels Anderson (Area VII, Neb., Kan., Colo., N. M., Okla, Tex.), and Peter H. Odegard (Area VIII, Wash., Mont., Ore., Ida., Wyo., Calif., Nev., Utah., Ariz.). There is no correspondence present for Herman Feldman (Area II, N. E.). John C. Gebhart served as central investigator for federal records. With the exception of a few letters by Jane Addams no letters by prominent persons outside the academic field are present.</p> <p>Very little correspondence is present of persons critical of the methodology or operations of the Comittee, exceptions being the file of correspondence with William H. Stayton (national chairman of the Association against the Prohibition Amendment) who accused the Committee of being biased in favor of prohibition, and the file of correspondence with Robert E. Park (Univ. of Chicago) who complained that no provision had been made to determine the sources that would reflect the effects of prohibition on organized crime.</p> <p>Collateral to the correspondence is the series Papers of the Director, which include reports and memoranda of the Regional Directors, their budget, suggested itineraries, and instructions, monthly reports of the Director (for April & May), drafts of schedules which served as guidelines for the kinds of agencies within each field which were to be surveyed, and a file of analyses and tabulations of the raw data contained in the Field Surveys. The final report submitted to the Council by the Committee is not present. Catlin's own report to the Committee dated August 20, 1926 is present only in very incomplete form (carbon copies of \"extra copies\" with numerous pages missing). As noted in the Introduction the final report of the Council is available in the Library's General Research & Humanities Division.</p> <p>The Field Surveys series contains the reports of the field workers who made on-site visits to public and private agencies and institutions and who conducted interviews with local officials. These reports which are both holograph and typewritten are entered on printed forms and record the name/title of the person interviewed, the name of the agency or institution, the type and nature of the record available, the place and date, and a brief evaluation of the sources. Persons interviewed include police chiefs, court referees, clerks of courts, truancy officers, public health officials, nurses, mission officials, prohibition administrators, employment managers, and officials of the Anti-Saloon League. Included are numerous specimens of the forms used by the agencies and institutions surveyed. The evaluations contain many interesting comments and opinions by local officials relating to local conditions, public temperance, and crime. Only major cities were covered by the surveys.</p>"}
{"value"=>"<p class='list-head'>The Social Science Research Council committee records are arranged in four series:</p>\n<ul class='arrangement series-descriptions'>\n<li><div class='series-title'><a href='/mss/2807#c1075440'>Correspondence of the Director</a></div>\n</li><li><div class='series-title'><a href='/mss/2807#c1075456'>Papers of the Director</a></div>\n</li><li><div class='series-title'><a href='/mss/2807#c1075467'>Field Surveys</a></div>\n</li><li><div class='series-title'><a href='/mss/2807#c1075488'>Miscellaneous Printed Matter</a></div>\n</li></ul>\n", "type"=>"arrangement"}
arrangement
{"value"=>"<p>Three series: I. Correspondence of the Director; II. Papers of the Director; III. Field Surveys</p>", "supress_display"=>true}
acqinfo
{"value"=>"<p>The records came to the Library by gift from the Social Science Research Council in 1934. The records were stored for many years in the Library's basement in the Main Building, unprocessed and uncataloged.</p>"}
processinfo
{"type"=>"processing", "value"=>"<p>jds, April 1981</p>"}
extent_statement
3.5 linear feet (6 boxes)

Update Collection TOP

Update from EAD XML File

Resources TOP

PDF finding aid



https://nyplorg-data-archives.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/collection/pdf_finding_aid/ssrc.pdf

File attachments

No files attached.

Repository Assets

No UUIDs attached.

Living at NYPL Archives

Sign in to add or edit a living at feature for this collection.

Export Collection to ArchivesSpace